Technology & Platform Selection
For all companies that rely on high-quality mobile IT solutions
Meet the expectations of your business and its users
Adapted to the latest features
E-Invoicing Technology & Platform Selection
Purpose
Evaluate and select the most appropriate e-invoicing technology and platform for the organization.
The selected solution must support the organization’s current invoicing processes while providing scalability, regulatory compliance, interoperability and flexibility for future e-invoicing requirements.
The solution should integrate effectively with SAP S/4HANA and support relevant e-invoicing standards, including EN 16931, UBL and Peppol.
Business and Technology Requirements
The e-invoicing solution should be evaluated against the following requirements:
| Category | Key Requirements |
| ERP Integration | SAP S/4HANA integration, APIs, IDocs, XML, OData |
| E-Invoicing | Structured electronic invoices, credit notes and invoice validation |
| Peppol | Peppol BIS, Access Point, SMP/SML and AS4 |
| Standards | EN 16931, UBL 2.1 and country-specific CIUS |
| Country Coverage | Support for current and future target countries |
| Compliance | VAT, local mandates, audit trail and digital reporting |
| Outbound Invoicing | Invoice generation, transformation, validation and transmission |
| Inbound Invoicing | Invoice reception, validation, matching and processing |
| Integration | API, middleware and SAP Integration Suite capabilities |
| Monitoring | Status monitoring, error handling, retries and alerts |
| Security | Authentication, authorization, encryption and data protection |
| Scalability | Transaction volumes, legal entities and countries |
| Operations | SLA, support, monitoring and incident management |
| Reporting | Invoice status, delivery status, errors and operational reporting |
| Future Readiness |
Technology Architecture Options
Several architectural models should be considered during the selection process.
Option A — SAP-Centric Architecture
SAP S/4HANA
│
▼
SAP E-Invoicing / Integration
│
▼
Peppol Access Point
│
▼
Business Partner
This approach keeps a significant part of the e-invoicing functionality within the SAP ecosystem.
Option B — SAP + Integration Platform + E-Invoicing Provider
SAP S/4HANA
│
▼
SAP Integration Suite / Middleware
│
▼
E-Invoicing Platform
│
▼
Peppol Access Point
│
▼
Business Partner
This approach provides a clear separation between SAP business processes and external e-invoicing connectivity.
Option C — External E-Invoicing Platform
SAP S/4HANA
│
▼
API / XML / IDoc
│
▼
E-Invoicing Platform
│
┌───┴───────────────┐
▼ ▼
Peppol Local Networks
│ │
▼ ▼
Customers Authorities
This model allows the e-invoicing platform to manage multiple networks, formats and country-specific requirements.
Option D — Own Peppol Infrastructure
SAP S/4HANA
│
▼
Own E-Invoicing Platform
│
┌───┴────┐
▼ ▼
Access SMP
Point
│
▼
Peppol Network
This provides maximum technical control but also introduces significantly greater responsibilities for implementation, certification, security, maintenance and regulatory changes.
Platform Selection Criteria
A weighted scoring model should be used to compare potential platforms.
| Selection Criterion | Weight |
| SAP S/4HANA Integration | 15% |
| Peppol & EN 16931 Compliance | 15% |
| Country Coverage | 10% |
| Regulatory & Future Readiness | 10% |
| API & Integration Capabilities | 10% |
| Inbound & Outbound Processing | 10% |
| Monitoring & Error Handling | 10% |
| Security & Compliance | 7.5% |
| Scalability & Performance | 5% |
| Total Cost of Ownership | 7.5% |
| Total | 100% |
Each platform should be scored against the same criteria to create an objective comparison.
Peppol Provider Assessment
The selected Peppol provider should be evaluated on both technical and operational capabilities.
Key questions include:
- Is the provider officially Peppol certified?
- Does the provider support both sending and receiving invoices?
- Which Peppol BIS specifications are supported?
- Does the platform support EN 16931?
- Are country-specific requirements supported?
- Does the platform provide standard APIs?
- Does it integrate with SAP S/4HANA?
- How are rejected invoices handled?
- Are automatic retries supported?
- Is invoice and delivery status available through an API?
- How is audit information maintained?
- How long is transaction data retained?
- Does the platform support multiple legal entities?
- Does it support multiple countries?
- How are regulatory changes incorporated?
- What SLA and support model are provided?
- What are the implementation, subscription and transaction costs?
- What options exist for changing provider in the future?
SAP S/4HANA Integration
The integration architecture should clearly separate SAP invoicing processes from external e-invoicing connectivity.
A typical architecture is:
SAP S/4HANA
│
▼
Billing Document
│
▼
Invoice Data Extraction
│
▼
UBL / EN 16931 Mapping
│
▼
Validation
│
▼
Integration Layer
│
▼
E-Invoicing Platform
│
▼
Peppol Access Point
│
▼
Customer Access Point
│
▼
Customer
The integration layer should provide standardized interfaces and prevent unnecessary coupling between SAP and the selected e-invoicing provider.
This approach makes it easier to replace the e-invoicing provider or Access Point in the future without redesigning the core SAP invoicing processes.
Proof of Concept
Before making the final platform selection, a technical Proof of Concept should be performed.
The PoC should cover at least:
- SAP S/4HANA invoice extraction
- Invoice-to-UBL transformation
- EN 16931 validation
- Peppol transmission
- Successful delivery
- Invoice rejection
- Automatic retry
- Credit notes
- Invoice attachments
- Inbound invoices
- Invoice status updates
- Error handling
- Monitoring and logging
- API integration
- Audit trail
The objective is to validate the complete end-to-end process rather than testing the platform in isolation.
Commercial and Operational Assessment
The final selection should also consider the total cost and operational impact.
The following costs should be identified:
- Platform license or subscription
- Implementation costs
- Integration costs
- Peppol transaction fees
- Support and maintenance
- SAP development
- Middleware costs
- Testing and certification
- Country expansion costs
- Regulatory change costs
The organization should also assess the vendor’s SLA, support organization, availability, incident management and disaster-recovery capabilities.
Future Regulatory Readiness
The selected platform should not only satisfy today’s e-invoicing requirements but also provide a foundation for future digital tax reporting and regulatory requirements.
Particular attention should be given to:
- EU e-invoicing developments
- ViDA
- Country-specific e-invoicing mandates
- Continuous Transaction Controls
- Digital Reporting Requirements
- VAT reporting
- Cross-border transaction reporting
- Future Peppol developments
Regulatory adaptability should therefore be treated as a key selection criterion.
Recommended Selection Approach
The recommended selection process consists of six phases:
Phase 1 — Requirements Definition
Define business, technical, regulatory and integration requirements.
Phase 2 — Market Assessment
Identify suitable e-invoicing platforms and Peppol service providers.
Phase 3 — Shortlisting
Evaluate providers using the agreed weighted scoring model and create a shortlist of approximately three to five candidates.
Phase 4 — Proof of Concept
Validate the most important end-to-end scenarios using the organization’s SAP S/4HANA environment.
Phase 5 — Commercial & Contractual Assessment
Compare pricing, SLA, support, security, scalability and contractual conditions.
Phase 6 — Final Selection
Select the platform that provides the best combination of:
Business Fit + Technical Fit + Compliance + Integration + Cost + Future Readiness
Target Architecture Recommendation
For a typical SAP S/4HANA environment, the preferred architecture is:
SAP S/4HANA
│
▼
Integration Layer
│
▼
E-Invoicing Platform
│
▼
Peppol Access Point
│
▼
Peppol Network
│
▼
Business Partner
This architecture provides a strong separation of responsibilities:
SAP S/4HANA
Owns the business transaction and invoice creation.
Integration Layer
Handles data exchange, transformation and integration.
E-Invoicing Platform
Handles e-invoicing standards, validation, country requirements and processing.
Peppol Access Point
Handles secure connectivity to the Peppol network.
Business Partner
Receives or sends the structured electronic invoice.
This architecture provides a scalable foundation for a multi-country SAP e-invoicing strategy while reducing dependency on a single technical component or provider.
This version is suitable as a chapter in an SAP S/4HANA / Peppol E-Invoicing Architecture & Implementation Plan.
Challenges
- Is your core idea or technology technically possible to build
- Find hidden roadblocks, technical flaws, and unexpected challenges early
- Having a bad or unworkable idea early that is wasting a large budget on full development
- Convincing bosses, teams, and investors to fund the project
- Having a clearer idea of the time, tools, and experts you will need for the real project
Approach
- Plan of approach
- Perform a Proof of Concept
- Create a realistic overview
Results
- Test Feasibility
- Reduce Risk
- Save Money
- Gain Stakeholder Buy-In
- Optimize Resources
The Challenges
%
Cross-Platform Compatibility
%
Performance and Battery Optimization
%
Security and Data Privacy
%
App Maintenance and Technical Debt
Through our custom-made mobile IT apps and services, we provide high-quality, reliable, and fast smart solutions for your business challenges. Apps that deliver clear added value to your business processes. For now and in the future.
The Approach
Phase 1
Strategy and Discovery
- Conducted a thorough assessment of ABC Manufacturing's operations, including production processes, technology infrastructure, and workforce capabilities.
- Engaged with key stakeholders through interviews and workshops to understand pain points and gather insights.
Phase 2
Architecture Selection
- Analyzed production workflows and identified inefficiencies.
- Implemented lean manufacturing principles to streamline processes, reduce waste, and improve product quality.
- Introduced key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor progress and drive continuous improvement.
Phase 3
Development and Integration
- Evaluated current technology and recommended modern, cost-effective solutions.
- Assisted in the selection and implementation of new machinery and an integrated manufacturing software system.
- Provided training for employees on new technology and processes.employee morale and engagement.
Phase 4
Maintenance and Analytics
- Facilitated strategic planning sessions with senior management to define short-term and long-term goals.
- Developed a comprehensive growth strategy, including market expansion, product diversification, and customer acquisition plans.
- Established a clear roadmap with actionable steps and timelines.
The Results
%
Increase In Employee Productivity
%
Increase In Employee Productivity
%
Increase In Employee Productivity
%
Increase In Employee Productivity
Ready to Grow Your Business?
Schedule a free consultation with our expert team to discuss your business needs and goals. We'll provide you with valuable insights and a clear path forward, tailored specifically for your company.